Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 09:52:49 -0700 >From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com> >Subject: RE: [Leica] M$ again, sigh! w > >Horst, > >He bought MS-DOS for $50,000 and then used it to build his empire. THe >original writer may have borrowed routines/ideas from UNIX which was already >in use for more than 10 years. Like optics design, everyone borrows from >Everyone else. Case in point, how many stories and movies were based on >Romeo and Juliet? Cinderella? Answer: More than we can name. > >Peter K Actually, to support your argument, as a case in point, many people have noted that Romeo and Juliet is very similar to Novellino by Masuccio di Salerno in 1476 and "La Giulietta" by Luigi da Porto in 1535. Luigi claimed to have heard the story from an archer of Verona called Peregrino who claimed to have heard it in turn from his father. In 1554, one Bandello published another novel which had a similar story, and also claimed to have heard it from someone called Peregrino. Pierre Boisteau later published a novel based upon the Luigi and Bandello's work, but re-worked several parts. From english translations of Boisteau work by Arthur Brooke in the form of a poem called "The Tragical Historye of Romeus and Juliet" in 1562, and a novel called "Palace of Pleasure" by Paynter which had a tale titled "The Goodly hystory of the true and constant love betweene Rhomeo and Julietta", it is evident that Shakespeare himself also adopted what was a tale that was popular for a long time when he first published Romeo and Juliet in 1957. It is also speculated that Cinderella also has many origins. One of the popular ideas is that the story was based upon a Chinese fairy tale, which appears to be one of the older versions of the story, though that is up to debate. There was also a Native American version that appears to be independant from any European or Asian origins as well. While the specifics are different, the general story is the same. One could support the theory of the Jungian archetype, where there are certain universal ideas that permeate human consciousness and manifest themselves in the folklore of different cultures. Joseph Campbell was a fan what with his dispositon of Star Wars and Lord of the Rings being the contemporary iteration of the classic hero quest. There is a theory that there are only few truely original proto-ideas, from which all other ideas are but a derivative, an evolutionary change. These proto-ideas are rare, and if remembered, always revolutionary in nature. For instance the wheel was a proto-idea. Wagons, chariots, cars, bicycles, etc are all but evolutions of the proto idea (kind of like object oriented programming, with different classes, more specific classes inheriting the properties of a larger more general class which it is a member of). Of course these evolutions take a lot of hard work, effort and creativity and in some instances genius. To sum up this long winded and pompous post and bring this whole thread back to the original discussion "RE: [Leica] Re: Lens Designs and history- the only take" does it really matter if lens designs are fully independent creations, or improvements to old designs. As long as they are indeed improvements, and that the people doing the improvements do not violate international laws. Patents do not last forever, for example the Tessar patent ended in 1920 and the Planar patent (I believe) ended 1914. The Biogon and the later Hologon patent was based upon a master patent by M.M. Roosinov, so they like the Aviogon or the Super Angulon are all derivatives as well. Anyone who wished was able to freely manufacture lenses based upon those designs or even copy them verbatim once the international or locally recognized patents had expired. They just could not use the trademarked names for the designs. As for the lens mounts and rangfinding devices in the bodies, I do not have any information on them, so perhaps they were ripped of, I do not know. Alex zone@panix.com P.S. Thanks for everyone who gave me advice on changing the light seals on my R4 body