Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: RE: [Leica] Canon 135/3.5 chrome lens (non-Serenar).
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 17:05:01 -0000

Marc - Fascinating..
B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Marc James
Small
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 8:33 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: RE: [Leica] Canon 135/3.5 chrome lens (non-Serenar).


At 12:46 PM 7/29/99 -0000, BD Colen wrote:
>Marc - While you're technically correct that a "copy," assuming that it is
>an exact copy, cannot be better than the original, what we all take to be a
>"copy," or rip-off if you will, certainly can be better than the original
if
>the rip-off artists improve on the original. For a hypothetical example,
>suppose Nikon had copied the Sonnar 50 1.5 exactly, and then given it a
>superior coating to that of the original. We'd still call it a copy, but it
>might well be superior...Further, if two products are, in fact, precisely
>the same, but one costs $300 and one costs $15, isn't it fair to call the
>$15 product superior to the $300 product? :-)

Well, since you mention it, Nikon and Canon also ripped off Zeiss's
patented coating process -- even Leitz didn't sink to that level!

You are, of course, correct, in saying that a well-constructed copy can be
better than a poorly-made original.  However, the Zeiss originals were
extremely well made lenses and were, in fact, superior to the Nikon and
Canon lenses in one important regard, that of the glasses used.  (The
initial production by Canon and Nikon did use Schott glass imported during
the War by submarine, but this had run out by the early '50's, and the
Japanese struggled a bit to establish domestic supplies of optical glass.)
The German lenses were made from a broader range of optical glasses and,
Postwar, Schott was breaking new ground in developing new melds.  The
Japanese were unable to compete in this and, for that matter, still allow
most research in this to be done in Germany or the US.  (Hoya and Zeiss
have an arrangement whereby Hoya references some of its production to the
Schott catalogue, for instance:  Hoya is pouring Zeiss glass, under
license.)

Marc



msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!