Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] another dumb question
From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:30:07 -0700

><snip>
> The reason the expression is f/a number is that it is based on a
> mathematical expression, ie, f - the focal length divided by the true
> physical entry pupil diameter gives you the 'aperture', which actually
> means aperture ratio. Somebody just screwed up in the late 19th century,
> confused some of the components and gave us a mangled expression. I still
> find it easier to deal with than the logarithmic EV sequence. ><snip>
><snip>

I sat on line getting my Hasselblads looked at for free today at Pro Photo here
in Portland Oregon.
They were backed up and I got to talking with the guy one behind me.
He was saying he didn't like the new PM5 45 degree meter finder because he
couldn't figure out incorporating EV's into his mode of thinking. Said it would
inhibit his bracketing.
I then of course go into a song and dance about the joys of EV use. About how my
first Voigtlander as a 13 year old kid had an EV system and pointed out the
window to the
sunny area being EV 18 and the shadow being EV 15 so you could just shoot it at
16.5 with negative film. And about how I love going out with my little crank on
my Hasselblad and take EV readings and how convenient and nostalgic that is for
me. And about how my Gossen Luna pro Digital has an EV mode.
But no EV's on the Leica so there you go. You can't have everything.
Mark Rabiner