Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Personally, I've always preferred the XP2...and find the XP2 Super to be much better. I have my lab print my wedding proofs on color paper with a brown tone (semi-"sepia") and the XP2 looks wonderful! My clients are always curious how I give them "that timeless look"... Bob Keene > >Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:58:19 -0400 >From: "Paul Schiemer" <schiemer@magicnet.net> >Subject: [Leica] Comment on T400CN > >Didn't personally shoot the stuff, just ran into it in the communal darkroom >where I do some work. Guy was having a fit trying to get a print out of it. >Due in part to his lack of expertise, and because the negs are just so >'different'. >I'd been curious about it, how convenient it must be, eh? So I decided to >help him. All but one of the images were fashion shots outdoors, bright >sun, reflector, and bracketed. We picked one of a woman in leather jacket to >print through (onto Kodak B&W paper). > >I pride myself on being able to judge a neg quickly and, at least, get >within the ball park with an initial test exposure. Then I dial it in with >a 2 sec. step test strip. Not with this stuff! > >It's just plain weird to asses, which will be overcome with experience I >suppose. Even with the test strip it was hard to judge where the optimum >print would land. I guess I was looking for the 'telltales' found in normal >B&W- the contrast ratio, shadow detail and specular highlights. Sure, it's >all there, but not like a 'real' neg. [Holes have a tone.] > >The resultant print was muddy and flat, by comparison to the TriX neg I was >pulling off my enlarger next door. Different images mind you, different >exposures too, but there's a quality missing in the T400CN print. >Maybe there's a special way to dial out the mask? I read the instructions >and, typical Kodak, very basic; no real clue on how to get them to be snappy >prints (not like 'snappy' shots). "Punch", 'snappy', whatever you call it. > >It's probably a good thing to have on hand just in case a story editor or >designer asks the pro to do some B&W during the same shoot. You can expose >it and run it at the same time your color stuff is getting done. >And it probably won't be around long- the way things come and go at big >yellar. > >no archive