Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dr. Blacktape comments: Well, a 35 Summicron ASPH with an extra stop and quite a few extra ounces - if the Summicron is the Anita Eckberg of the 1950s, the Summilux ASPH is the Anita Eckberg of the 1990s. :-) But it is still one hell of a lens - in Dr. BT's opinion the ideal "standard" lens for the M shooter who eschews twinkies. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jim Brick > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 12:39 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] RE: 35 Summilux Asph. > > > At 04:48 PM 7/8/99 +0100, you wrote: > >In Erwin's comparison of the 35 Asph. lenses and the last 35 > Summicron-M he > >writes: > > > >*It seems as if the Summilux-M ASPH 35mm is a Summicron-M 35mm > with one full > >stop more.* > > > >Any comments? > > > > Yes, > > It is true! > > Jim > >