Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] ideal SINGLE lens for M6HM
From: "Francesco" <fls@san.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 20:33:05 -0700

If I could never crop, I'd have to go with the 50/2, since the 35/2 frame is
not totally visible at times through the HM.

Francesco



- ----- Original Message -----
From: Bud Cook <budcook@ibm.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 1999 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] ideal SINGLE lens for M6HM


> How about an added qualification....what do you chose if you could NEVER
> crop your original images!
>
> Bud
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Francesco <fls@san.rr.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 1999 3:30 PM
> Subject: [Leica] ideal SINGLE lens for M6HM
>
>
> > I would like everyone's opinion on what would be the ONE SINGLE lens
> > that you would carry with an M6 0.85, if it were to be the only lens you
> > would use for the next 10 years.  This implies that this lens would have
> to
> > cover
> > all situations with great versatility.  Obviously, a 21mm or 135mm would
> be
> > much too limiting, so which would you choose?
> >
> > Francesco
> >
> > PS:  I am torn between 35 and 50, leaning to 35.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>