Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The second test was even more demanding, The Apo-Summicron was focused at two meter at an obsolete computer motherboard wit a myriad of s small etched lines, tiny capacitators with extremely fine colour rings on them (to indicate its capacity), all kinds of small objects, round, square etc. The smallness will be appreciated if give you the figure of 0.05mm to 0.3mm as a measure for some of the objects. At 2 meter object distance we have a reduction of scale of roughly 20. That means that the details on the negative/slide will be 2/1000 mm to 15/1000 mm. The Summicron can easily resolve 100lp/mm with good contrast, that is lines with a width of 5/1000 mm. The object details then fall just within and just ouside the recording capability of the lens. But: the lens can resolve even smaller details with lower contrast and so we need a new concept. A detail is clearly resolved when the outlines are measurable and the distance to the next neigbour is also measurable. A detail is detectable when you can see the object but are unable to measure the distances or the scale of the object. At 10times again exceedingly fine detail is clearly resolved. And you can detect that there are more details within the details. At 30 times the slide film justl resolves these additional still finer details, but at 100 times the grain pattern is so rough that the recording capacity of the lens is too demanding for this film. The cneg film shows the same pattern, but now at 100 times the very fine details are faded away in larger dye blobs. Now we have the reversed situation. The film when enlarged looses information content. The slide film was of an older generation, but the cneg one of the most recent ones. So the choice of film is even more important now with these super Leica lenses then it was in the past. Erwin