Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] R 6.2... and other R considerations!
From: Gerald Hsu <gerald@phys-ha2mpkb-71.eng.sun.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT)

>>Entry Level Body? Quite unusual on Leica, but there is one R that is cheaper
>>(relative) thant all the other, this is the R-E, the major difference is
>>that you just have three "progs", manual coupled with central spot meter,
>>aperture priority with central-spot meter and at least aperture priority
>>with integral central weighted meter. No MLU ;-)
>>but the same rugness as the other.

>>Maybe a really good choice if found in good shape.


Entry level Leica reflex body? My vote would go to the SL if you do not 
need those fancy doodad features of the R. No MLU though. An excellent 
condition SL can be aquired at a much lower cost than the RE or even the 
R4. The SL is a bargain considering it is a mechanical camera (the lasting
value), IMO, it is a good alternative to the R6 (or R6.2) as well.


Gerald Hsu