Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-Elmar and Depth of Field Hyperfocal distance
From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 18:59:50 +0200

Mark,

Hyperfocal distance is a function of (1) aperture; (2) focal length. So in your
examples below, it is correct that in the first case your hyperfocal distance is
8' and 12' respectively.

Nathan

Mark Rabiner wrote:

> I've never thought I understood the Hyperfocal distance concept fully.
> With a 35mm lens if I stick the infinity at the right at f16 I get
> everything from 4' to infinity in focus and I am focused at 8'. I notice
> 4' is half of 8' as you say. You are saying 8' is the Hyperfocal
> distance. And I guess it is only the Hyperfocal distance at f16.
> With a 35mm lens if I stick the infinity at the right at F11 I get
> everything from 6' to infinity in focus and I am focused at 12.' So the
> Hyperfocal distance changes with each F stop am I right? I keep hearing
> about how each lens has it's Hyperfocal distance which confuses me as it
> would change with each F stop. Unless I have it wrong. Which would mean
> I am hopelessly ensnared in a circle of confusion!
> Mark Rabiner

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium
General photo page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator
Belgium photo page: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman