Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-Elmar and Depth of Field marks
From: "R. Saylor" <rlsaylor@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:48:38 -0400

> This I understand. My question therefore seems to be how does one
> calculate or even estimate just what that "as much infront of 'infinity'
> as possible" might really be?

At hyperfocal, the far distance is infinity, the near distance is one-
half hyperfocal. (This gives maximum DOF.)

If you set focus at infinity, the near distance is hyperfocal, the far 
distance is... who knows? The mathematics gives a negative number 
(the negative of hyperfocal, to be exact), which indicates something 
beyond infinity.

It has been suggested (by a Minox user, but I've lost the URL) that 
for distant scenes, it is better to focus at infinity rather than 
hyperfocal. The argument in favor of this involves perspective 
geometry, which is as much off-topic as Rolex, Mont Blanc, and 
Rolls Royce.

Richard S.