Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gosh, Dick! If that old Summarit is just hangin' around causin' you grief, I'd be glad to take it off your hands!! I wouldn't want you to be tempted to use any 'substandard' glass! :o}~ Dan - - I can please only one person a day. Today is not your day; and tomorrow doesn't look too good either! - ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard E. Baznik <reb10@po.cwru.edu> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Summarit/Summilux performance > Robert: > > That would be a very sweet part of the year indeed. > > My experience is with the Summarit (used with a IIf since the 1960s, and > occasionally since 1993 with an adaptor for M3 and M6) and the 35 Summilix > non-ASPH (used for the past six years). > > The Lux is a superior lens in most ways, I think: sharper, better contrast, > and lighter. My only problem with it is its vulnerability to flare, made > more of a problem because it is difficult to find lens shades for some > versions. Do everything you can to locate a shade. There is an interesting > article on the 35 Summilux by Dick Gilcreast at the LHSA "Viewfinder" site > <http://www.pond.com/~lhsa/articles/summilux.html>. > > The Summarit was a revelation in the 1960s, but I hardly ever use it now > unless I want really soft images. It's also a much better lens with a > shade, and what a lovely shade it is -- rectangular black metal, vented. > > Bon chance!///Dick Baznik > ___________ > > At 09:04 PM 6/13/99 -0400, Robert wrote: > >Bonsoir, > > > > In a couple of weeks I ll probably be in the very sweet period of the year > >when I will be able to afford another M lens (new or used? we ll see). I do > >a fair amount of shooting in low light and my budget only allowed me the use > >of a Summarit (SM with adapter) on my M5. I am thinking of either the 50 or > >35 Summilux (non ASPH). Anyone knows first hand the performance of these 2 > >lenses wide open (1.4 & 2) in comparison to the Summarit? > > > > > Richard E. Baznik > Vice President for Public Affairs > Case Western Reserve University > 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7021, U.S.A. > Voice: (216) 368-2338 > Fax: (216) 368-6674 >