Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: RE: AF & auto exposure
From: Guy Bennett <guybnt@idt.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 09:34:35 -0700

- --============_-1283262815==_ma============
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


>if the leica is a quill pen, what's the F5, a bic?
>guy
>
>Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: A Mont Blanc
>
>================================ Peter,
>Your choice of Mont Blanc sits easily with me, I have heard they are very
>expensive, break down quite readily and provide erratic ink flow, often
>failing spectacularly by flooding an owners pockets with ink as well.
>
>Jem (whose Parker 51 seems to be the epitome of an M-Leica)


jem,

i've got an old vacumatic that has never spilled a drop. it's a
magnificient example of a fine, manual (don't accept no cartridges) pen of
the quill variety.

guy
- --============_-1283262815==_ma============
Content-Type: text/enriched; charset="us-ascii"



<excerpt><italic>if the leica is a quill pen, what's the F5, a bic?

guy


Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: A Mont Blanc


</italic>================================ Peter,

Your choice of Mont Blanc sits easily with me, I have heard they are
very expensive, break down quite readily and provide erratic ink flow,
often failing spectacularly by flooding an owners pockets with ink as
well.


Jem (whose Parker 51 seems to be the epitome of an M-Leica)

</excerpt>


jem,


i've got an old vacumatic that has never spilled a drop. it's a
magnificient example of a fine, manual (don't accept no cartridges) pen
of the quill variety.


guy

- --============_-1283262815==_ma============--