Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Glenn wrote: I am terribly humbled by these antique pictures; I cannot produce this type quality with my high tech gear. The sharpness, gradation, and other visual characteristics of these prints are breathtaking. I realize that these pictures are contact prints, but are the wonderful films and lenses that we use today in reality lower in quality in the essential operating parameters than those of that time? Glenn I have shared a bit of your experience, looking at a family album in a camera store. It was a record of their trips to Banff National Park in the late 20's. I would suspect a box camera or folding Kodak of some sort, with a slow lens and film, but the shots were excellent. The photographer had a real sense of composition and balance. I think the technique was more important than the technical details. To get on topis with Leica, Heinrich Harrer (the real life character, played by Brad Pitt in "Seven Years in Tibet") published "Lost Lhasa" a couple of years ago. Most photographs were taken with a Leica, using left over movie film, and developed in some primitive equipment. But the photographs are very well done, very moving, and really tell the story of an end of an era before the Chinese took over the country. I think again technique prevailed over the technical aspects. A good photographer can make equipment and material sing, a poor one can have the best equipment in the world, and still produce a technically perfect, totally boring result. I suspect the album Glenn discussed may have been done by a photographer with talent, if it moved him so much a 80 or 90 years later. Noel Charchuk