Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Me too: new M6HM bought 22 Dec. 98 and flawless. Nathan Jim Brick wrote: > I'll add my M6, that I bought new last year, to Dan's sample. So now it's > two good, one bad. > > Jim > > At 06:43 AM 6/1/99 -0400, you wrote: > >Since you are trying to draw conclusions from statistical sample sizes of > >one, I can tell you that the Leica M6 that I bought last year works > >perfectly. So my example cancels out the one you listed (twice). > > > >Dan C. > > > >At 12:07 AM 01-06-99 EDT, DonJR wrote: > >> >> > >> > >>Dear Sir: > >> > >>Please explain this latest post since it must have slipped past the censors: > >> > >> > >>"I bought a new M6 body from Don Chatterton a few weeks ago. [snip] > > - -- Nathan Wajsman Overijse, Belgium General photo page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator Belgium photo page: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman