Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Facts versus opinions - can I explain in more detail what I meant?
From: "Dan Post" <dwpost@email.msn.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:05:18 -0400

BD-
You 'sposed to use the ashtray when the window's closed! :o}~
Dan
- -----Original Message-----
From: B. D. Colen <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Wednesday, May 26, 1999 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Facts versus opinions - can I explain in more detail
what I meant?


>At 12:21 PM 5/26/99 -0400, you wrote:
>> Whew!
>>Long post! But interesting!
>>Insofar as UV absorbing cement- The fact is that glass, even optical glass
>>absorbs most UV- that's why you don't get a very good tan through a glass
>>window!
>Wait a minute, there, Dan'll...I've gotten BURNS on my left arm on long
>drives with the window closed...
>
>
>
>
>
>>And should you want to do UV photography, where UV is used to make the
>>image, the only lens that is useful there, is a lens, the elements being
>>made of quartz crystal. Hasselblad had one used mainly for questioned
>>documents examination, and ran about 6 or 7000 USD about 20 years ago.
>>In photofinishing, the only problems I find with UV comes from disposables
>>with plastic lenses, and some P&S cameras with plastic lenses. Mainly the
>>disposables- outdoor photos sometimes require that 'yellow' be added to a
>>print since the UV really stimulates the blue sensitve layer more than the
>>others.
>>Dan
>>
>