Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] anti-Leica-ism?
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 07:32:43 -0700

Typical.  Just like a trial lawyer.  Start to tear about the people and
ignore thse facts.

Peter K

> ----------
> From: 	Lucien[SMTP:lucien@ubi.edu]
> Reply To: 	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Sent: 	Tuesday, May 11, 1999 6:20 AM
> To: 	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: 	Re: [Leica] anti-Leica-ism?
> 
> 
> Peter,
> 
> First take note that I refrained from reacting to your posts
> since months.
> 
> I fully agree that it's your right to stay on this list, 
> and to write anything you want, the way you want.
> 
> But my very personal opinion is that, until now, your posts
> were boring, so boring!
> 
> Why ?
> 
> Because, most of the time, they were either obviously wrong
> or obviously obvious!
> I'm still waiting to learn something new from you.
> Which is a pity talking about a person who sent us hundred
> of posts!
> 
> You are maybe an expert in some other field(s), but not in
> the Leica, 
> and certainly not in human relationship.
> 
> In the past, I received (few) private e-mails stating that
> you are maybe not 
> the kind of person I think you are.
> (Some were coming from member of the your famous "gang of 5"!)
> 
> I don't believe them anymore. 
> (Sorry guys!)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Lucien
> Brussels
> 
> N.B. Do you really believe the last two mails you committed
> deserved the highest priority ?
> :-)
>