Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Old ./. new lenses
From: "Peter Loehndorf" <wp.loehndorf@cityweb.de>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 00:15:24 +0200

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BE9B43.5D97DBE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for your warm welcome!
I know you are right!=20
BTW that reminds me of an event during the 1973 Photokina in Colgne. A =
Belgian
stood at the Leica booth and had his ancient Leica IIIf repaired. I told =
him
he should buy a new one. He looked at me and asked "Why?" He then told =
me
that he was a designer by profession and he always took a photo of his =
new
designs. That old Leica had been to the Belgian Congo several times. Of
course that old Elmar 1:3,5 /50 had not been
corrected for color-film, but as long as the publishers of his magazine =
did
not complain, why then buy a new one?
Best regards: Peter

- -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----=20
  Von: Hans Pahlen=20
  An: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us=20
  Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. Mai 1999 15:54
  Betreff: SV: [Leica] Old ./. new lenses


  Peter, welcome to the LUG-list!
  Yesterday evening I was watching some 25 years old slides from Paris. =
I used a Summicron 50 DR and Kodachrome 25. I was amazed by the quality! =
Most pictures were made using middle apertures.
  =20
  This is my personal view: Go on using your 1970:s lenses. You can =
trust them to deliver very good quality pictures. The only difference is =
that the newest lenses will be better on the largest openings. Why not =
upgrade only one lens, the one you use most, and keep the others.
  I upgraded to the 35/2 asph, and it is definately better wide open, =
but that is all. On other F/stops the difference is very marginal, and =
hard to see.=20
  =20
  In short: it depends on how much avialible light photography you do, =
and if you need the highest possible performance, all the way out into =
the corners.
  It is your decision, but remember that the 1970:s lenses are damned =
good! Why not spend your funds on travel and film?=20

  /Hans=20
  =20
  <I am new to this list, but I am old leica fan. I own a M3, M4, M5, =
Summicron 35, 50, 90, Elmarit 135. <2 Pradovit 250 Autofocus combined =
with a DU 24M, etc. Everything bought in the 70 except the M3 <which I =
bought a few months ago. (I always wanted to work with a M3!)
  >>> Do you think a can sell my lenses and buy new ones, those with APO =
and ASPH? Or, to be <precice: Can you really see the difference??? What =
are your experiences???  Thanks for your advice:
  <Peter


- ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BE9B43.5D97DBE0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 =
Transitional//EN">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Thanks for your warm welcome!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I know you are right! </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>BTW that reminds me of an event during the 1973 =
Photokina in=20
Colgne. A Belgian<BR>stood at the Leica booth and had his ancient Leica =
IIIf=20
repaired. I told him<BR>he should buy a new one. He looked at me and =
asked=20
"Why?" He then told me<BR>that he was a designer by profession and he =
always=20
took a photo of his new<BR>designs. That old Leica had been to the =
Belgian Congo=20
several times. Of<BR>course that old Elmar 1:3,5 /50 had not =
been<BR>corrected=20
for color-film, but as long as the publishers of his magazine did<BR>not =

complain, why then buy a new one?<BR>Best regards:=20
Peter<BR><BR></FONT>-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>Von:</B>=20
  <A href=3D"mailto:hans.pahlen@mark.komvux.se"=20
  title=3Dhans.pahlen@mark.komvux.se>Hans Pahlen</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>An:</B> <A=20
  href=3D"mailto:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us"=20
  =
title=3Dleica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.=
us</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Gesendet:</B> Sonntag, 9. Mai 1999=20
15:54</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Betreff:</B> SV: [Leica] Old ./. =
new=20
  lenses</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Peter, =
welcome to the=20
  LUG-list!</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT size=3D2>Yesterday =
evening I was=20
  watching some 25 years old slides from Paris. I used a Summicron 50 DR =
and=20
  Kodachrome 25. I was amazed by the quality! Most pictures were made =
using=20
  middle apertures.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>This is my personal view: Go on using your 1970:s =
lenses.=20
  You can trust them to deliver very good quality pictures. The only =
difference=20
  is that the newest lenses will be better on the largest openings. Why =
not=20
  upgrade only one lens, the one you use most, and keep the =
others.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I upgraded to the 35/2 asph, and it is definately =
better=20
  wide open, but that is all. On other F/stops the difference is very =
marginal,=20
  and hard to see. </FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>In short: it depends on how much avialible light =
photography=20
  you do, and if you need the highest possible performance, all the way =
out into=20
  the corners.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>It is your =
decision, but=20
  remember that the 1970:s lenses are damned good! Why not spend your =
funds on=20
  travel and film? </FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>/Hans&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>&lt;I am new to this list, but I am old leica fan. =
I own a=20
  M3, M4, M5, Summicron 35, 50, 90, Elmarit 135. &lt;2 Pradovit 250 =
Autofocus=20
  combined with a DU 24M, etc. Everything bought in the 70 except the M3 =

  &lt;which I bought a few months ago. (I always wanted to work with a=20
  M3!)</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>&gt;&gt;&gt; Do you think a can sell my lenses and =
buy new=20
  ones, those with APO and ASPH? Or, to be &lt;precice<FONT =
color=3D#ff0000><FONT=20
  color=3D#000000>:</FONT> <U>Can you really see the difference??? What =
are your=20
  experiences???</U><FONT color=3D#000000></FONT>&nbsp; Thanks for your=20
  advice:</FONT></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>&lt;Peter</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BE9B43.5D97DBE0--