Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]We are indebted to you for passing on the following comments. Your comment: There is NOT a problem. Leica has told me, and Erwin, that it was a small batch of cameras. All of them non-TTL cameras is what I was told as well. And all it takes to fix the problem is a bit of polishing of the pressure plate. This post raises some very, very interesting questions as follows: 1. Does this mean pressure plates that scratch the back of film in the M-6 cameras are considered by Leica not to be a problem? Maybe not for Leica, but it is not a desirable trait for a $2,000.00 camera body that the owner expects to meet very minimal standards that are met by $50.00 cameras world wide. 2. Does "non-TTL" mean those cameras that do not have the through-the-lens flash exposure capability? If so, that would mean the very great majority of M-6 cameras were produced with faulty pressure plates since the TTL flash capability M-6 cameras are relatively new on the market. 3. How many thousands of "non-TTL" M-6 cameras has Leica sold? 4. If there are thousands of Leica M-6 cameras with faulty pressure plates, does the above comment mean that Leica is serious when it says "There is not a problem." 5. Does this comment mean the faulty pressure plates were culled from production and then intentionally installed in just the "non-TTL cameras" or were the good pressure plates set aside to be installed in just the TTL cameras? 6. Does this mean that it is the conscious decision of Leica to install known inferior parts in the non-TTL cameras while only acceptable parts are installed in the TTL cameras? 7. Does this mean the non-TTL M-6 cameras are assembled using faulty parts so Leica will have an outlet for inferior parts that it has bought from subcontractors? (It is my recollection form an earlier post comment from Mr. Puts in which he advised that Leica is now buying many parts from subcontractors.) 8. The comment stated: "And all it takes to fix the problem is a bit of polishing of the pressure plate." What does Leica mean by "polishing" the pressure plate. Enough to remove the black anodizing, so the aluminum mirror finish of the pressure plate will reflect light off its mirror surface and bounce back through the film thus degrading the image? Or does Leica mean removing the anodizing, re-polish or re-lap the pressure plate, then anodize the pressure plate? The "bean counters" saga continues and with each revelation, Leica's reputation is brought into greater question.