Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01BE8C1E.2082C0A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Francesco=20 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us=20 Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 11:17 AM Subject: [Leica] scan comparison If some of you have a spare minute, could you please check out these = two scans and tell me which one looks better OVERALL, in terms of color accuracy, = skin tones, sharpness,=20 contrast, brightness, etc. Thanks a million! http://www.photorealm.com/F/sharon01.jpg http://www.photorealm.com/F/sharon02.jpg Francesco fls@san.rr.com Is there any advantage to having both files at 1350dpi when 72dpi is = the maximum resolution most computer screens can cope with? Of the two images, sharon02 is my preference. The facial skin tone in = sharon01 is a bit washed out but the skin tone of the chest and arms in = 01 I find is more realistic than that in 02. Would it be possible to = bring the facial skin tone in 01 up to that of the chest and arms in 01. = If that was possible, I would much prefer 01 over 02. As 01 stands right = now I think that the folds in, and the texture of, the skin in 01 is = more lifelike than in 02. =20 jh =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01BE8C1E.2082C0A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: = 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A href=3D"mailto:fls@san.rr.com" title=3Dfls@san.rr.com>Francesco</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20 href=3D"mailto:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us"=20 = title=3Dleica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.= us</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, April 21, 1999 = 11:17=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Leica] scan = comparison</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If some of you have a spare minute, = could you=20 please check out these two scans and</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>tell me which one looks better = OVERALL, in terms=20 of color accuracy, skin tones, sharpness, </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>contrast, brightness, etc. = Thanks a=20 million!</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20 = href=3D"http://www.photorealm.com/F/sharon01.jpg">http://www.photorealm.c= om/F/sharon01.jpg</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20 = href=3D"http://www.photorealm.com/F/sharon02.jpg">http://www.photorealm.c= om/F/sharon02.jpg</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Francesco</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20 href=3D"mailto:fls@san.rr.com">fls@san.rr.com</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Is there any advantage to having both files at 1350dpi when 72dpi = is the=20 maximum resolution most computer screens can cope with?</DIV> <DIV>Of the two images, sharon02 is my preference. The facial skin = tone in=20 sharon01 is a bit washed out but the skin tone of the chest and arms = in 01 I=20 find is more realistic than that in 02. Would it be possible to = bring the=20 facial skin tone in 01 up to that of the chest and arms in 01. If = that=20 was possible, I would much prefer 01 over 02. As 01 stands right now I = think=20 that the folds in, and the texture of, the skin in 01 is more lifelike = than in=20 02. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>jh </DIV> <DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01BE8C1E.2082C0A0--