Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob Keene wrote: . > I like the reduced weight of the non-ASPH (vs. the HEAVY ashp). I'm not > trying to open the flame wars again with a "my lens is as good as yours" > type of thing; I'm sure the ASPH is superior- > BUT, for a first Leica 35mm you CAN'T beat this!!!! IMO, nothing can beat the 35/2 ASPH in that respect. It's the best (compromise) regarding lack of flare, sharpness and size. And it's the only 35mm for M that I really trust at 99,9999 %. Lucien