Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry - quite correct - Newman. - -----Original Message----- From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Friday, April 02, 1999 1:12 Subject: Re: [Leica] I missed it. >The Krupps shot was another example, by Arnold Newman. > >Dan C. > >At 05:47 AM 01-04-99 -0800, you wrote: >>Goebbels? or was it the industrialist, Krupps? >> >>At 10:29 PM 3/31/99 -0800, you wrote: >>>One candid picture that worked very well with the subject looking >straight at >>>the camera is Eisenstaedt's shot of Joseph Goebbels. It is the image of a >>>sinister and evil personality. It would not have worked at all if Goebbels >>>didn't look straight at the camera. >>> >>>Ben >>> >> >>Mike Leitheiser >> >>"When the trout are lost, smash the state." >> Tom McGuane >> >>