Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Addicted to Love, was Did you see Mighty Joe Young
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 13:47:22 -0800

I hope you mean hopelessly in Love with Charlize?

- -----Original Message-----
From: Paul Klingaman [mailto:pklingaman@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 1999 1:23 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Addicted to Love, was Did you see Mighty Joe Young


Mark,

Perhaps I'm nit-picking here, and sticking my foot in my mouth, but I'm 
quite certain I remember a scene of Meg in the Park using an M6, 
photographing the Matthew Broderick Character as he speaks with his old 
love.  No??  I do also remember seeing Margeret using the same in the 
Coffee Shop scene.  No Oedipus complex, here.  Yeesh, now I'll have to 
rent the video tonight just to make certain...  

Hopelessly in love w/Meg,
Paul

>From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
>Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Addicted to Love, was Did you see Mighty Joe Young
>Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 12:29:34 -0800
>
>Paul Klingaman wrote:
>> 
>> Didn't see Mighty Joe, but did anyone happen to catch "Addicted to
>> Love?"  Throughout the movie, Meg Ryan's character sports an M6, 
taking
>> pictures of her affections.  I thought Meg was sexy in "When Harry 
Met
>> Sally", but YEESH with a Leica up to her eye!
>> 
>Again it was not Meg Ryan with the M6 in that movie it was her mother
>played by Margaret Sullivan. How you could confuse Meg with Margaret is
>Freudian to the max one might think.
>The use of the camera obscura technique sure turned my head around?!
>Mark Rabiner

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com