Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"First, let's KILL all the Leica collectors..." I'd like to add that THEN, we all take a beer-can opener and "engrave" our names and "MOM" on the top cover of ALL our Bodies and lens barrells....to hell with black tape, lets mask the windows and "color code" our gear with spray paint... Anything to prevent another generation of LHSA..... Walt On Sun, 21 Mar 1999, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > I too find the Viewfinder an excellent publication. I also had a similar > experience with the last issue having been damaged by moisture somewhere on the > way to Belgium--a phone call resulted in a friendly conversation and a prompt > replacement. > > This whole controversy about alleged inaccuracies looks to me like some kind of > personal vendetta. So far none of the posters have pointed out those > inaccuracies. In any event, Viewfinder is not and does not pretend to be a > peer-reviewed publication like the scientific journals--and even those contain > articles with mistakes. > > I agree with you that the Viewfinder is head and shoulders above LFI. > > Nathan > > > > Gary Todoroff wrote: > > > I have nothing but admiration for the job Roy Moss has done as editor of the > > "Viewfinder" and as past president of LHSA. > > > > My first conversation with Roy was during my initial year as an LHSA member > > in 1996. I received a damaged issuer of the "Viewfinder", so called Roy on > > the phone. I was pleasantly surprised to find a gentleman concerned that my > > magazine should be in perfect condition, and who treated me immediately as a > > fellow member of the LHSA group. > > <BIG SNIP> > > -- > Nathan Wajsman > Overijse, Belgium > > Photography page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator/index.html > Motorcycle page: http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/downs/1704/index.html > >