Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/12[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 01:54 PM 3/12/99 -0500, you wrote: > There has to be more to the >content of a photograph then microscopic clues as to which optical system >produced it. Otherwise, what is the point to photography? The assumption that it's only microscopic has been proven time and time again to not be true for many people. Not just a few nuts or "true believers." The point of photography has nothing to do with lens performance in one way. That's for sure. But on the other hand, if you have a choice to own a Rembrandt, or a reproduction, which would you choose, even if some people couldn't tell the difference (and assuming you could)? Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch D)inner not ready: (A)bort (R)etry (P)izza.