Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm curious as to why you have both 1.4 and 2.0 lenses. Does each one serve a different purpose? I have the 2.0 asph and I'm thinking of trading it in for a 1.4. Ben TEAShea@aol.com wrote: > I don't have the non-aspheric lens, but I can tell you that the new aspheric > lens is excellent. It, and the 35 1.4, are the best 35 mm lenses that I have. > They are significantly better than the Contax 35 lenses. Get the aspheric and > you will clear up the problem at 2.0. > > << I have done some testing on my 35/2 non-aspheric, which I love for its > lightness and portability. Also, takes wonderful photos. However, I > noticed on my test negatives that at f2 there is a noticible fuzziness, > especially in the corners which begins to clear up at f2.8 and is > noticibly better at f4. Is this normal for a fast lens wide open? Is > the new aspheric tack-sharp at all apertures?? >>