Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:39 AM 25-02-1999 -0800, Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net> wrote: >That outfit he describes the OM 4T is very Leicalike in my opinion. The >glass may not be quite as excellent as he says it is but excellent none >the less. The compactness of its look in a camera case could easily have >more appeal than the same outfit in R8 to an M user. Those are little >gems of cameras and lenses. When they say T they are not talking about >titanium paint. Its a shame the whole company lost its image as a >serious contender in the autofocus era. It was the system my best friend >used when I started out with my chunky (pre FM influenced by Olympas) >system. Its possible that if it wasn't for them we'd all be shooting >with M5's and speaking…..? >Mark Rabinereeze > At what point and / or under what circumstances would any alleged differences in the quality of the optics become apparent to a moderately discriminating viewer? jh