Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re:[Leica] RE: Tri-X and Kodak vs Ilford?
From: (Bob Keene/Karen Shehade)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 08:38:47 -0500


please let us know your results in this? I'm going to be running some tests
myself (if I can ever get ahead of these @#!$%# wedding albums!!) but would
LOVE to hear other peoples opinions! I plan to shoot alot of this 3200
Delta at weddings...particularly during ceremonies when flash is restricted
(using both Leica and Hassleblad).

Bob Keene

>You're welcome.
>I just started going through two bricks of Delta 3200, in 35mm & 120. Having
>fun seeing what it can do and figuring out my dev times. Thanks to Ilford we
>finally have a fast b&w that we can shoot in both formats! Good luck to
>you too!
> wrote:
>> Fred:
>> Thanks for the note.
>> I have had such good luck with Ilford products that I am afraid to try
>> anything else.  I did try some Ilfords Pan F last week in 6x6 format and it
>> was beautiful.  I wanted to find out for myself if it made sense to shoot
>> Delta 100 at ISO 50 or just use PAN F at it's normal 50 speed.
>>Negatives from
>> both are splendid.
>> Continued good luck!
>> Bob Bedwell