Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 user/collectible!
From: "Andreas Frijdal" <frijdal@tin.it>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 22:21:56 +0100

dear Jim,

we might not all be collectors, but wasn't the "PAD" a bit funny ? the
professionals.
please don't hit too hard.

ciao

andreas



Dr Andreas Frijdal
Casalmonte
50020 San Polo in Chianti (Fi)
Tuscany
Italy

frijdal@tin.it   +39-055-8307318 home
frijdal@iue.it  +39-055-4685332 work
- -----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: 14 February 1999 21:57
Subject: [Leica] M6 user/collectible!


>Peter K. wrote:
>
>> >  This is the reason the M is more a collectible than a user
>> camera.
>>
>>> The Ms are nice but in reality little
>>> used today by the great majority of photographers.
>>
>
>With this logic, it is difficult to imagine how Leica stays in business.
>Collectors and people who don't take pictures typically don't buy new
>cameras. The M6 would be history by now if "photographers" didn't buy them.
>As with any camera system, there is a percentage of buyers that, for some
>reason or another, never use the equipment. But this cannot be the
>majority. There are enough "photographers" buying new M cameras and lenses
>to fully support that division of Leica. It would be impossible to design
>and produce all of the new M (ASPH and APO) lenses as well as the TTL M6
>without a viable market. The company, Leica AG, would be long gone if
>"users" did not buy new equipment.
>
>The notion that the M is more a collector than a user, or that the M is
>little used today, is, fortunately, incorrect.
>
>Jim