Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] B&W output from digital devices
From: "Joe Stephenson" <joeleica@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 12:51:12 -0700

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BE4EAA.B6DE9580
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have been following the digital vs. continuous tone discussions with =
mild interest. I have a question for some of you folks who are more =
familiar with the digital processes. What is the best B&W output method =
for digital images? Can you obtain output that is like, or as good as a =
fine B&W print? What is the cost for good B&W output, if it's avaible at =
all?
Thanks,=20
Joe Stephenson

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BE4EAA.B6DE9580
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Times New Roman">I have been =
following the=20
digital vs. continuous tone discussions with mild interest. I have a =
question=20
for some of you folks who are more familiar with the digital processes. =
What is=20
the best B&amp;W output method for digital images? Can you obtain output =
that is=20
like, or as good as a fine B&amp;W print? What is the cost for good =
B&amp;W=20
output, if it's avaible at all?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Times New Roman">Thanks, =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Times New Roman">Joe=20
Stephenson</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01BE4EAA.B6DE9580--