Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Unquote, was: Contax color rendition
From: Dan Post <>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:11:39 -0500

I'm gonna stand back, lest I get salt rings on my shoes!    :)

- -----Original Message-----
From:	Jeffrey Hausner []
Sent:	Thursday, January 21, 1999 11:27 AM
To:	''
Subject:	RE: [Leica] Unquote, was: Contax color rendition

	My standard reference is the "Merriam Webster's Second
International, Unabridged."  Unfortunately, I do not keep a copy in my
office.  I would also accept up to the second edition of Fowler or the
"Curme Grammar."  However, I ask correspondents to simply use their own do you UNQUOTE something?  It can't be done and it is not


> Jeffrey Hausner wrote:
> > 
> > Alan--
> > 
> >         I do not accept the "American Heritage Dictionary" as
> authoritative
> > on anything.  I didn't accept it the first time you sent this message, I
> > don't accept it the second, and will not accept it if sent a third time.
> I
> > am not certain why you are bringing French into this, but next time try
> > "Harap's."
> Buzz,
> Do you accept Webster's New World Dictionary ?
> Un'quote interj. end the quotation.
> Lucien