Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ken Wilcox wrote: > > >Ken Wilcox wrote: > >>snip > >> One of the advantages of what I use is the limited amount of chemical that > >> is needed. 2 rolls of 35mm (36ex) needs only 8 ounces of chemical, each > >> additional roll needs 3 ounces more. > >> > >>snip > > > >What about Fog? > >Mark Rabiner > > If I understand the question, there is no noticeable difference in overall > density with constant agitation - at least with the films I use. (I don't > use T-max of any type) > > Ken Wilcox > I talking about the presence of air which tends to introduce more or even irregular fog in films... often a problem with dipping and dunking or otherwise sloshing. I think developers usually need more sulfite to prevent this but some unusual formulas are not sulfite based or friendly. Mark Rabiner