Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry Eric, I don't agree with you on this one. However, I do agree with you 99% of the time. I am an absolute fanatic on the entire darkroom process. I have attended special classes on the handling of Tmax and it is not consistently in the same category, for me, as the Delta films. I have run tests with it at overeposure/under develop, normal exposure/normal develop, under exposure/ over develop plus combinations in between. You will be pleased to know that I used an R8 for all of the tests. I can get a grainless 11x14 using Delta 100 or 400 with Xtol and I can't with Tmax. However, I have never used Tmax developer with Tmax film. Also, it appears that the new Delta 3200 can be used effectively between ISO's 400 and 2000, though I am not through with the tests. Sorry, I just don't like Tmax film and I did give it a honest run. Happy New Year, Bob Bedwell << >Yes, I agree with you about TMax. I just don't like the "clumps" of grain and >the contrast. Of course it could be me but I don't think so. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it's only bad in contrast and grain if not processed properly. For people used to processing more forgiving films, it can be a bear. I had problems with it when overexposed, or overdeveloped. When processed and exposed properly, only Delta 100 could compete for grain with 100 OR 400 TMax films. Don't believe me. Just wait for John Sexton's next book coming out about power stations. Some of those pictures prove TMax can handle a massive amount of contrast and give beautiful highlights and shadows. It's all in the processing. -- Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO >>