Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan: You do have a dilemna. I don't know if I could make a good decision either. My initial thought when I first started considering the Noctilux was I would need another 50mm for non-lowlight photography. I thought that the Noctilux would not be as sharp and I do believe that this is somewhat correct. However, there is not as much difference as I thought there would be. The Noctilux will do everything that the Summilux or the Summicron will do. In my opinion the perfect mate to the Noctilux is the 75/ 1.4 which I do not own, yet! Please let me know your opinions of the Noctilux after you shoot with it. Thanks, Bob << Bob, I tried a Noctilux in Lucien's office once, and last week at a dealer in Brussels. The slides convinced me that this is a lens for me. I am struggling a bit right now with the decision as to whether to keep my other 50mm lens, the 1.4 Summilux. I do find the 50mm focal length useful, and I originally bought the Summilux as a compromise between the optical quality of the Summicron and the speed of the Noctilux. Now that I have the real thing, I am not sure it makes sense to keep two 50mm lenses. I guess I will have to shoot a bit with the Noctilux at more normal apertures and see how I like the results. Nathan >>