Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Photographie
From: Dominique PELLISSIER <pelliss@droit-eco.univ-nancy2.fr>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 09:49:45 +0100

At 20:28 14/12/98 -0000, "Dr James Harper" wrote :
>I wrote, on 10 December:
"I subscribed to this for about 10 years in the 70's and 80's, and even
once bought a job lot of several hundred from earlier years.  But I must
confess that, apart from the technical stuff at the back, I found too many
of the articles turgid,  funereal in tone,  and sometimes simply  boring.
 There were some good ones too, of course."
For the record, and the archives, all reponses to my request for views were
critical.  No-one came forward to defend it.  Such a pity, really. It must
cost Leica a lot of money, and make little or no profit.  I recommend it to
insomniacs.  It has no side effects, except on Leica.
###########
As we say in french :"Tout ce qui est excessif n'a pas d'importance"
(everything that is excessive has no importance).

Dominique Pellissier