Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Walt, May I add the obvious: Eric is verbose. See "photojournalist". ;-) - - Phong - -----Original Message----- From: Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu> >r.e. Eric taking things personally: >I've been reading Eric for a short while now, and have drawn some >conclusions. Of course, Eric will disagree with these conclusions, >as he does with most things. I've never responded directly to >Eric before, although he has to me on the reflector several times. >These are my conclusions. Disagree with them. Tell me about it. > >1. Eric is a photojournalist. Not a reporter with a camera, not >a print editor. Not an administrator. An idealist. A defender >of photojournalism's ideals as they once existed. (or did they?) >2. Eric is an elitist. See "photojournalist". >3. Eric is arrogant. See "photojournalist". >4. Eric probably considers himself quite liberal. See "photojournalist". >5. Eric works for an employer that tolerates him because he is > good and reflects the ideals of a past generation of mass media. > Whether they exist(ed) or not. See "photojournalist". >6. I like Eric's attitude. I hate Eric's attitude. See >"photojournalist" >8. Eric wouldn't like me. But he'd like to have heated arguments >with me. See "photojournalist" - also #7. I'd buy him lunch. In >spite of this, he'd piss me off and give me indigestion. >11. Did I mention that Eric is a photojournalist?