Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V4 #63
From: Dick Chandler <rchandler@hainc.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:28:39 -0700

Nathan

Schneider has a useful and succinct discussion of optical quality measures
on their website.  The paper addresses your questions directly, I believe.
It's at www.schneideroptics.com/quality/quality.html.

Dick Chandler

.>From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
>Subject: [Leica] Reading MTF charts
>
>All this talk about whether Kodachrome or Fuji Velvia is best and how to
>evaluate them, especially Erwin's last post with the conclusion "MTF
>charts are the way", inspired me to grab a couple of data sheets and
>look at the MTF charts. But I must confess ignorance in not knowing how
>to interpret the curves. What does the "spatial frequency" on the
>horizontal axis mean? Is it simply lines per mm? And what is special
>about the number 20 that Leica lenses are calibrated to? On the vertical
>axis we have some percentages. For instance, in the curve for Fuji
>Provia (and Sensia) I see that for a spatial frequency of 20 the
>corresponding percentage is about 70%. What does this mean? I have some
>vague idea that a higher % is better, but what does this imply for
>ordinary usage? And finally, I see that for spatial frequencies lower
>than 10 the percentage is above 100%. Why?
>
>Thanks in advance for enlightening me.
>
>Nathan