Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Francesco, I'd suggest you perform the test again with the cameras on a tripod and with similar focal length lenses. This should determine if you have mechanicalproblems with your R7/lens. In my experience, I've found I can hand hold my Leicaflexes every bit as good as my M cameras, perhaps better. Bud Five Senses Productions wrote: > I just may keep the M6 after all. > I performed a non-scientific test of my own yesterday. > I took out my M6 and my R7 together, handheld, > and shot the same things with both cameras. > On the M6 I used the 50/2, and on the R7 I used the > 100/2.8. On both cameras I used an aperture of > 5.6 to 8, depending upon light. > I found that my M6 slides were WAY sharper and > clearer than the R7 shots. Now I know it may not be entirely fair > because I used different focal lengths, but the difference was > absoultely dramatic. The M6 shots were stunningly sharp > for being handheld (1/250 to 1/500), and looked as if they > were tripod shots. The R7 shots were fuzzy, with not much appearing > to be focused sharply. The results were consistent throughout all the > R7 slides, not just on a few. In some, it seemed that the point that I had > focused on was not in focus, but another point was. Very disappointing. > > I have determined the following, and maybe you can comment on > whether these things may or may not be true. > Either: > (a) I have a hard time handholding the R7 (weight, size?) > and the M6 is better suited for my style of shooting because > of size and ergonomics > or > (b) Something is wrong with the focusing screen or diopter > setting on my R7 > > Can someone comment? > > Francesco > >