Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]JOHN GILBERT wrote: >Today, the candidate R user must weigh price/risks with R3/4/5 2nd >hand offers, which do not have a very good reliability reputation, >even on this list and which are very low-key spec wise. http://www.angelfire.com/biz/Leica/page13.html offers some information on buying a used R3/R3mot including the following statement: (...)'The selective metering on the R3 is exceptionally good due to the fact that the photocell for the spot metering has an auxillary mirror with a very sharp cut-off point and an extremely narrow acceptance angle more so than any other type of camera including the Leica R4 . The Leicaflex SL has this same system which gives very accurate spot metering .(...). To sum up , the R3 is a very good reliable camera , the mechanics and electronics are well built in a traditional manner utilizing six CDS photocells in three groups of two , with all six being used in the integrated measurement and just two cells with an auxillary mirror , in the selective mode . Memory lock is available in both modes , but is only indicated in the spot metering sytem . After a general service , the R3 would perform well for at least ten years before needing any further attention. All of the Leica lenses can be used as well as extension tubes etc. If the R3 mot is purchased then this will accept a motor winder and remote control unit , further expanding it's uses (...) My personal experience with the R3mot corroborates this statement: bought one used in 1984, body did not synchronise with winder. It was repaired under dealer's warranty (at Wetzlar, not Solms), worked flawless since. Christian Becker Berlin