Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Lens wt vs finish->Now question about titanium
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 18:02:10 -0400

In the case of Leica, the finish of the M6 Titanium is titanium, but there
are some camera bodies such as the Nikon FM2/T and the prism housing of the
F5 wich are supposed to be solid titanium. 

Dan C.

At 03:25 PM 21-09-98 -0700, you wrote:
>is the piece Titanium or Titanium FINISHED brass?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Date: Monday, September 21, 1998 3:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Lens wt vs finish->Now question about titanium
>
>
>>You make it sound as if titanium is not sutable for camera bodies either!
>>Thank you for clarifying the issue.
>>
>>Dan C.
>>
>>At 03:26 PM 21-09-98 -0400, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>Dan Cardish wrote
>>>
>>>"I have been told that titanium is no more coslty than steel, and not any
>>>more difficult to machine."
>>>
>>>Sorry Don you have been told wrong.
>>> Loads of "high tech" materials are used in consumer goods for marketing
>or
>>>fashion  reasons only. (They are often used inappropriately by engineers
>as
>>>well!)
>>[snip]
>>>Titanium is certainly excellent at corrosion resistance but the 6Al4V
>>>normal alloy is not especially strong and all Ti alloys are extremely
>notch
>>>sensitive and prone to cracking. Also because of its low Youngs modulus
>>>Titanium parts are not very stiff. Still its a good material for a very
>>>limited number of applications. It is specified far to often for
>>>fashionable rather than technically sound reasons!
>>>
>>>Ti does not make a very good choice for a lens barrel in my view.
>>
>
>
>