Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]OK we've all heard you -- please trade recriminations privately. I doubt there is anyone on this list who doesn't have an opinion about this (I certainly do), but I am grateful to everyone who has declined to rise to the bait. It's not what I joined this forum to discuss! There *are* points which are germane, such as "What would be the effects of a settlement on the Leica-users as customers of Leica Corp.?" But I'd just as soon forgo such discussion if it would mean putting up with more disrespectful, jejune, ad hominem and personal battles clogging up my email... A U S T i N . >> Date: 9/1/98 10:24:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time >> From: rjr@usip.com (Robert Rose) >> Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Reply-to: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >> Now, as to TM, I address you directly. Consider your words >SNIP< >> <<From: TM <spaniel@pacbell.net> >> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 15:42:50 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Slave Unit >> >> The obvious source of the lawsuit? Extremely greedy attorneys and their >SNIP< >