Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks a lot, Pascal! I looked at the Minilux today, and the idea of also having a Leica as my pocket camera was certainly tempting. However, it costs 30.000 BEF (vs. 20.000 for the GR1) and it lacks some of the things I like about the GR1. I does have a slight speed advantage, f2.4 vs. f2.8, but I think in the end I will simply replace the GR1. Nathan Pascal wrote: > On 17-08-1998 07:39 Nathan Wajsman wrote: > > >Looking at these specs, it appears that the GR1 is the superior camera, > >as it seems to beat the Minilux in all aspects except the manual > >focusing options and the "intangibles" category. I wonder if anyone has > >experience with both cameras and can comment on the differences? > >Incidentally, I am NOT considering the Minilux Zoom; although the zoom > >is tempting, the lack of an exposure-priority exposure mode and the lack > >of any exposure information in the viewfinder or on the LCD rules it out > >for me. > > Nathan: > > I concur with you on the Leica Minilux Zoom, its drawbacks are simply too > much for me. I own a Nikon 35 Ti for 4 years now and have always been > very satisfied with its tack-sharp results. The only drawback is the odd > viewfinder and the slightly discomforting procedures for manual > adjustments. But it has multizone metering and Nikon's 3D flash metering > (as on the F90x). And it looks great with that retro-look display on top. > I also have a Leica Minilux since about a month, and have only used it > sparsely so far. First one went back to the dealer as it had dust in the > viewfinder, which is unacceptable for a new camera. The replacement is > fine. The results with the Minilux are very good (look at my web page > under "Belgian delegation to NATO visits Florennes AFB " for some > impressions, but it's quasi impossible to really judge quality on the > web). > Consider that the Minilux has one big advantage over all the other > high-end compacts: its 2.4 lens which will give you a small extra margin > in dark weather, especially if you are using 100 ASA film. The viewfinder > is clearer than the one of the Nikon, but there is no indication of > shutter speed (except on the top LCD) as with the 35 Ti. > I do not dare to compare the results of both cameras as I have not used > the Minilux enough to speak with any authority on the matter. > Hope this helps. > > Pascal > > -------------------------------------------------------- > Check out: http://members.xoom.com/cyberplace/ > -------------------------------------------------------- > Macintosh PowerBook G3 - it eats Pentium notebooks for lunch > -------------------------------------------------------- > <<< PGP public key available on request >>>