Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I must agree with Eric; however, the problem was to get contrastier negatives. I would suggest that he follow that advice of the other LUGer and learn to develope his own film. The expense is minimal, and the cost is much less than having someone else do it. Further, you have infinitly more choice in what the outcome will be. To get more contrast from a negative, it has been typically the rule of thumb to UNDERexposed from 1/2 to 1 full stop, and push the developement about 10% more than normal- the exact amount is reached with experimentation but that is not as arduous as it sounds. This method basicall 'steepens' the Log d curve. I practiced shooting a 'target made of a piece of white matte board onto which I affixwd a Kodak gray card, gray scale and color seperation scale. I use it for both Color and B&W to check out the response of color film, and to test exposure and development for B&W. I first used the technique when a friend asked me to develop aerial photos of industrial plants; at first they were too 'flat' and lacked contrast. I prevailed upon him to use Verichrom Pan, a favorite of mine for medium format, exposing it at 50 ASA instead of 100, then overdeveloping. The results were fabulous. I can't say how this works with thin emulsion films, since the only one I have a lot of experience using is the now defunct Panatomic -X. T-Max 400 I have barely tested. I do know that Tri-X and Plus-X work well with this method. Sorry for the long post, but here's hoping we can get another LUGer into the 'soup'! Dan'l dwpost@msn.com