Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I suppose if you reallllly want to be "anal," you could do with your tripod what some of the scientists at the Marine Biological Laboratory, in Woods Hole, MA, do with their microscopes: Place an inflated inner-tube on a flat surface - floor in the case of a tripod - place a flat steel plate on the inner tube, errect the tripod on the steel plate. Thennnnn do your testing for vibrations. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of George Huczek Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 3:35 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Checking a tripod for resonance At 07:55 AM 03/08/98 +0100, you wrote: Boy I'm glad there is someone else who thinks all this "vibration stuff is <<< > <<<" a little too anal>>>> >I guess somewhere in the world this is a required excercise, but for the >life of me I can't imagine when it matters diddly squat to someone using a >Leica, RF or SLR. [cut] I suppose to a large extent it depends on what kind of photography you do, how the resulting pictures are to be displayed, and how critical you want to get about technique. Admittedly, techno-stuff for its own sake is retentive. However, for anyone using SLRs and long telephoto lenses with slow shutter speeds, for doing _practical_ lens testing, or for just about any kind of macro work, minimizing camera vibration is critical in those applications, and in others as well. There just happens to be a need, for some at least, to ensure that those legendary Leica optics are allowed to deliver what they are capable of optically, without being restrained by other factors which are able to be controlled. - -GH