Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --WebTV-Mail-206454188-524 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit In addition to being heavier, it will probobly also be better built..:-) I think that there are two BIG advantages of the new Hasselblad over a Mamiya 7 (these are going on assumptions...yes, yes, I know what assumptions do:-). 1) Size. It looks as though the Hasselblad will be close to a "standard" sized 35mm camera, MUCH smaller than a Mamyia 7. 2)Flexibility. Imagine having an M6 with aperature priority (TTL by the way, unlike the Mamyia), built in motor drive, AND the ability to double the negative size on the same roll of film as regular 35mm shots. It also seems to have auto parralax correction and perhaps even adjustable viewfinder magnification a la the G1/G2 (the initial press release is a little vauge, but that is what it sounds like to me.). Once Hassey (or Fuji) releases some "regular" 35mm lenses for this camera, its full potential could be realized. Of course this camera has yet to be released...I think it is full of promise, and if it can deliver the expected quality at the prices that have been thrown around, a great deal as well... eyes - --WebTV-Mail-206454188-524 Content-Disposition: Inline Content-Type: Message/RFC822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Received: from mailsorter-101.iap.bryant.webtv.net (mailsorter-101.iap.bryant.webtv.net [207.79.35.91]) by postoffice-152.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.5/po.gso.24Feb98) with ESMTP id RAA15096; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 17:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1]) by mailsorter-101.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.gso.01Apr98) with ESMTP id RAA16130; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 17:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA22799 Wed, 22 Jul 98 16:45:35 -0700 Received: from mail3.microsoft.com by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA22793 Wed, 22 Jul 98 16:45:32 -0700 Received: by mail3.microsoft.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2328.0) id <PMRC13C2>; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 15:42:23 -0700 Message-Id: <2F2DC5CE035DD1118C8E00805FFE354C05A095A0@red-msg-56.dns.microsoft.com> From: Jim Laurel <jplaurel@microsoft.com> To: "'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Subject: RE: [Leica] Hasselblad XPAN Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 15:22:01 -0700 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2328.0) Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us The Mamiya 7 looks like the closest competitor. Mamiya supplies an adapter for the M7 that will give you these "panoramic" images with 35mm film, but with the added advantage of being able to shoot 120 as well! Other than the motor drive and a few other things, I don't see the great advantage of this camera over the M7. And this whole "panorama" business is a bit silly, isn't it? In the case of the Mamiya 7, that little adapter doesn't give you a wider angle of view on the 35mm filmstrip than you'd get with a regular 6x7cm frame, right? The XPAN in panoramic format doesn't give me a wider angle of view either... I don't see what all the fuss is about. Given what we know so far, the Mamiya is still the more flexible machine. It may be a little smaller, but I'll bet it's heavier than the M7. - --Jim Laurel - -----Original Message----- From: Paul Chefurka [mailto:pchefurk@ca.newbridge.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 12:48 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Hasselblad XPAN Isaac Crawford wrote: > > It seems to me that they would have to make the lenses slow to keep the > size down. If they will cover a 65mm image circle, they would be huge > at f 1.4!!! I think we all understand the technical issues involved with this thing. What intrigues me more are the product management issues. What's the market? What's the motivation? What's the business case? Answers to these questions are most obscure to me... Paul - --WebTV-Mail-206454188-524--