Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] CL vs CLE
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 20:36:08 +0200

The innards of the CLE are standard Minolta SLR parts from the period -
shutter, metering system etc. - so it should not be too difficult to
replace these. But of course Minolta=B4s policy of keeping parts in the
inventory is different from Leica=B4s. Raimo
- ----------
> From: Douglas McLernon <Douglas.McLernon@tcd.ie>
> To: Leica <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Subject: [Leica] CL vs CLE
> Date: 25. kes=E4kuuta 1998 11:35
>=20
> I thought that the CLE was the one that could be fixed and some parts
were
> no  longer available for CL. I seem to remember (perhaps erroneously)
that
> Hove still serviced the CLE but not the CL. I do know that they charg=
e
> considerably more to service an M3 as opposed to other M series.
> Doug