Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you. At 06:37 AM 6/18/70 , you wrote: >Alf/All, > >Francesco has made an offer to the LUG membership that's both extraordinarily kind >and of good heart; I thank him for making the offer. IMO your objections have been >spoken with a kind of 'beneath us' disdain that's innappropriate, at best; in effect >'criminalizing' Francesco for offering of himself. > >> I will not change my mind, and I refuse to accept, that essential parts of >> the LUG might be managed by you. > >Your point of concern comes from the Playboy courtcase and the listing of the 5senses >server as a 'pornographic' one. His explanation for what led to the court decision was, >beyond being none of our business, credible. From what Francesco has told us, he >participates in a genre of photography known as 'glamour' photography, much the same >as the work of our own LUG hero Erwin Puts. > >Would you have a problem showing your photos next to Erwin's? > >What if Compuserve offered us free space? I presume that the perception Compuserve >promotes, that of a 'civilized neighborhood', would appeal to you? > >Here we have an established entity which includes a photoforum. Their photoforum has >member rules which specifically permit the 'right' of the forum staff to selectively >discriminate on the basis of POV (or for whatever reason best fits). They also track >where their membership goes and make a 'profile' history available to whomever they'ld >like (be they advertisers, spammers or maybe even religious zealots) without notifying >the user. And they're owned by AOL, whose membership is notorious as the most >prolific consumers of pornographic materials on the net. > >It would seem that finding a server innocuous enough to meet your requirements would >be a rough task I'm fairly sure none of us are pure enough to undertake in an honestly, >'personally pure enough' sense. > >I say none of this to antagonize you and want you to understand that. I do however, >object to claimed Puritanism as vocally as you object to pornography. > >Men, glass houses, stones and all that. > >Regards, >Danny Gonzalez >