Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry, I missed the gist of your post. I stand corrected. >In a message dated 6/7/98 9:52:54 PM EST, rchdp@worldnet.att.net writes: > ><< I have to dispute this statement, Tom. there is also a 35/2 ASPH and one > other. A 24? >> > >There is an aspherical 21 2.8, an aspherical 24 2.8, and aspherical 35 2.0 and >an aspherical 35 1.4. But the only one of these that is a 1.4 lens is the 35 >1.4. The others are 2.8 lenses. > >Tom Shea >