Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]VPSIII is really nice for portraits, easy to get, and works just fine! dwpost@msn.com - -----Original Message----- From: Bill Bain <BBain@IMNET.com> To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 11:22 AM Subject: [Leica] Color print portrait film >I have been drafted into doing my daughter's soccer team portraits (the >commercial photographer that was hired did a less than adequate job (no, >he did not use a Leica!)). Each girl will have an individual portrait >and then the obligatory group picture. These will be done just prior to >their end-of-season party at our pool. I'm thinking, since my yard has >some nice areas with a variety of shade, that my M-3 with my 90mm >Elmarit on a tripod and perhaps my Vivitar 285 set on 1/16 power would >be a reasonable set-up for the individual potraits. While a lot of >folks would say use a 90mm Summicron to have more variety in DOF, I've >got to dance with what brung me. I think the soft lighting of open >shade would be quite pleasing and the electronic flash could provide a >mild 'catch-light' in their eyes and open up any shadows just a little >bit. I usually use the flash with a bounce diffuser to avoid the "deer >in the headlights" look. Just to be on the safe side I will have my >Canon EOS with a 28-105 zoom available as a backup and for the group >picture. > >Questions: > >Any film recommendations? Since I do expect these to be enlarged, fine >grain would be nice. Color print film would be preferred since I can >get the portrait proofs back during the party, but to use any sort of >fill flash with an M3, it'll have to be pretty slow. If I can't use >electronic flash, I'll try to use some sort of reflector and bounce some >light into the faces. I will have the opportunity to shoot a test roll >using my daughter as the model and refine exposure, fill ratios, >etc.before having to do it "for real." > >Any thoughts on the setup in general? I don't usually do portrait work >at all, but I've been "drafted" to make the best of a truly fubared >situation (would you take portraits of 10 year old girls in bright >noonday sun? They look like old women squinting and the harsh light >does nothing to capture the paradox of both the softness of them as >little girls and their toughness as competitors). I think the photog's >goals was to get it done as quickly as possible > >Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!