Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Five Senses Productions wrote: > > So are you implying that a powerful image can only be of a serious, > dramatic, or emotional life experience? Does this mean landscapes, > nudes, or photos of children at play cannot be powerful? I won't speak for Harrison, but for me to consider a picture "powerful" it must resonate with some deeper significance. Documentary photos of people have the most chance of doing this, as it is insight into the human condition that I find most resonant. Pictures of children at play can certainly be powerful. An example is HCB's "Seville, 1933". OK, OK, that's not *just* a picture of children at play, but it illustrates an essential feature of the powerful photograph - it must be able to transcend its subject matter in some sense. And of course St. Ansel proved that landscapes can be powerful, although I must admit I still can't say why. How did his pictures of Half-Dome and El Capitan transcend the merely spectacular (which they would have been in a lesser photographer's hands) and become powerful (which they indisputably are)? Paul