Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Why not a 35-50-90? (was: Tri-Elmar)
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 22:02:32 +0200
 
Me too! Raimo
- ----------
> From: Peterson_Art@hq.navsea.navy.mil
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Why not a 35-50-90? (was: Tri-Elmar)
> Date: 14. toukokuuta 1998 21:59
>      
>      It'd be a lot more popular with ME, I can tell ya!
>      
>      Art Peterson
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: [Leica] Why not a 35-50-90? (was: Tri-Elmar)
> Author:  leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us at Internet
> Date:    5/14/98 11:12 AM
> 
> Would a 35-50-90mm lens be more difficult to make than 
> the current Tri-Elmar?  Would it be equally as popular?
>      
> Just curious,
>      
> -Dave